Inter-cadre wars are outdated. Kenya Medical Practitioners, Pharmacists and Dentists Union represents doctors. Other health cadres have their own unions. But most healthcare practitioners still get this wrong.
Despite years of discussion, inter-cadre friction keeps simmering in our health sector—seen in the BScN–diploma nurse divide, the familiar tension between pharmacists and pharmaceutical technologists, and the longstanding rivalry between Clinical Officers (COs) and Medical Officers (MOs/doctors).
Today, I’m addressing the differences between pharmacists and pharmaceutical technologists. First, let me set out a few things I firmly believe:
- Everyone needs the highest form of education possible to deliver exceptional healthcare services.
- A pharmaceutical technologist with solid experience can sometimes outperform a qualified pharmacist in day-to-day practice.
- Pharmacists and pharmaceutical technologists can provide the best patient care without clashing—if both stick to their scope of practice.
It sounds counterintuitive, but this isn’t new.
In school, pharmacists are taught they’ll manage pharmaceutical technologists. In reality, pharm techs often manage themselves with no need for direct pharmacist oversight, and they dominate the community pharmacy market in Kenya.
Pharmacists expect high earnings to match their longer education and investment. But that’s not always the reality, even though the pharmaceutical “cake” is big. Here’s why tensions persist:
- Pharm techs feel they’re better in practice and demand equal treatment.
- Pharmacists sometimes get job offers paying the same as pharm techs, especially in community and private hospital pharmacies.
- The Pharmacy and Poisons Board allows pharmaceutical technologists to operate independently in many settings, even though the old view was that they should work under pharmacists.
- Some pharmacists struggle to run successful businesses, blaming pharm techs for focusing purely on sales instead of patient-centered care.
This creates an open playground for both sides to prove who’s “better” whenever opportunities or crises arise.
If we truly want to advance the profession, these fights are pointless. Both groups need to work as a team—and in most practice areas, that’s exactly what happens despite the noise.
The real root of cadre wars often lies with leadership in bodies like Kenya Pharmaceutical Association and Pharmaceutical Society of Kenya. They amplify imaginary problems to stay relevant, showing their members they’re “fighting” to protect them. They latch onto stereotypes that exist everywhere—not just in pharmacy.
In a tough job market, it’s easy to convince people their “brother” is the reason for their struggles: suppress him to rise higher.
Issues like the KDA bill and supervision rules at level 4 facilities have fueled court cases and heated debates (I’ll dive deeper into those in a future post).
What’s ignored is simple: as human beings, we need each other. We can’t all be at the same level—and that’s okay. That’s life.
If every pharm tech upgraded to a bachelor’s in pharmacy, the goalposts would just shift. Some would pursue PharmD or MPharm, then look down on bachelor’s holders, and the cycle continues.
There’s a reason you’re a pharmaceutical technologist and not a pharmacist. That doesn’t make you less human or less valuable.
Pharm techs fill a massive gap that pharmacists—still too few in Kenya—can’t cover alone. With pharmacist shortages, pharm techs often step up to handle pharmacist-level work.
Pharmacists handle unique roles like clearing permits, drug importation, regulation, and governance. In everyday practice—patient care, the heart of why most enter pharmacy—it’s more open. Debates rage over what pharm techs “can” or “can’t” do, but some restrictions feel pointless.
Look at the US for contrast: roles are strictly defined, often followed rigidly. Techs mostly work in the back—counting pills, prepping—while pharmacists verify everything (rules vary by state).
One famous case still sticks with me: a pharmacy technician used rubbing alcohol instead of water to reconstitute a suspension. It’s not about wondering how they couldn’t tell the difference—it’s the overgeneralization that banned all techs from reconstitution because of one error.
Here in Kenya, patients often reconstitute at home themselves—it’s straightforward. Using that incident as an excuse to restrict doesn’t hold up.
Prescription errors happen to everyone, regardless of experience or cadre. Blaming one group isn’t the fix. Awareness, training, and systems to catch/mitigate errors are what reduce risks—not blanket bans.
That said, quality varies everywhere. A pharm tech in Nairobi CBD or upscale areas often performs differently from one in rural spots or small estates. The same applies to pharmacists—some excel, others are average.
Humans are social animals. We crave dominance, recognition, and credit for our efforts. That’s what both pharmacists and pharmaceutical technologists want.
But here’s the bottom line: the profession thrives when we stop the turf wars and embrace complementarity. Pharm techs keep community access alive where pharmacists are scarce. Pharmacists bring advanced clinical insight, regulation, and oversight. Together, they cover more ground, serve more patients, and build a stronger system.
Instead of fighting over who “owns” the space, let’s own the outcomes—better access, safer dispensing, fewer errors, happier professionals. The real enemy isn’t each other; it’s shortages, quacks, weak enforcement, and a system that still leaves gaps.
Drop the outdated rivalries. Respect the scopes, value the experience, and collaborate. That’s how we actually move pharmacy forward in Kenya.
Let me know your thoughts?